Awesome Commentary is the first project taken by Meah Videoz. Simply put, its wrestling with alternative commentary.. totally improvised!
Some find it hilarious, others find it plain weird. We best describe it as random.

We are still currently re-uploading all our videos Check back everyday for a new video.

All commentary provided by Chief Strongbow & White Lightning

Click on a match to watch the video.


Mean Marc vs Brian Pillman

Lex Luger vs Macho Man Randy Savage

Bret 'Hitman' Hart vs Diamond Dallas Page

Sting vs Ric Flair

Booker T vs Bret 'Hitman' Hart

Jonny B. Badd vs Lex Luger

Triple H vs Chris Jericho

Scott Hall vs Chris Jericho

Booker T vs Kevin Nash

Zack Gowen vs Brock Lesnar

Syxx vs Rey Mysterio Jr.

Vince Russo vs Ric Flair

Owen Hart vs Diesel - Coming Soon

Hulk Hogan vs Bill Goldberg - Coming Soon

Owen Hart vs Razor Ramon - Coming Soon

Terra Ryzing vs Larry Zybsko - Coming Soon

The Rock vs Kane - Coming Soon

Shawn Michaels vs Owen Hart - Coming Soon

Bret 'Hitman' Hart vs Stone Cold Steve Austin - Coming Soon

Sean O'Haire vs Lex Luger - Coming Soon

Scott Hall vs Bill Goldberg - Coming Soon

Undertaker vs Isaac Yankem DDS - Coming Soon

Mick Foley vs Undertaker HIAC - Coming Soon




Copyright information :
Meah Videos likes to take this little snip from copyright laws. Under "fair dealing" :

Fair dealing is a term used to describe acts which are permitted to a certain degree without infringing the work, these acts are:

• Private and research study purposes.
• Performance, copies or lending for educational purposes.
• Criticism and news reporting.
• Incidental inclusion.
• Copies and lending by librarians.
• Acts for the purposes of royal commissions, statutory enquiries, judicial proceedings and parliamentary purposes.
• Recording of broadcasts for the purposes of listening to or viewing at a more convenient time, this is known as time shifting.
• Producing a back up copy for personal use of a computer program.
• Playing sound recording for a non profit making organisation, club or society.

One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the Copyright Act (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” Although fair use was not mentioned in the previous copyright law, the doctrine has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years. This doctrine has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.

Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered “fair,” such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:

• the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

• the nature of the copyrighted work;

• amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and

• the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

The distinction between “fair use” and infringement may be unclear and not easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.

The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author's observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report; reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of a damaged copy; reproduction by a teacher or student of a small part of a work to illustrate a lesson; reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports; incidental and fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported.”

Copyright protects the particular way an author has expressed himself; it does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in the work.

If WWE or any other company wish to remove our work, we would advise any company to read the above and also watch our work before considering legal action.